Skip to content

Weekly Digest | Issue 16

Valur Thrainsson
2 min read

Good morning,

We hope you are enjoying CompetitionFeed.

Here below you find the most read articles on over the last four weeks.


Spiegel Online

Collusion Between Germany's Biggest Carmakers

The diesel scandal is not a failure on the part of individual companies, but rather the result of collusion among German automakers that lasted for years. Audi, BMW, Daimler, Volkswagen and Porsche coordinated their activities in more than a thousand meetings. The exposure of a cartel. Read More.

REUTERS

BMW reassured top staff about cartel allegations: sources

Germany's BMW (BMWG.DE) has told its top managers that regulators probing reports of collusion among German carmakers will find the allegations hard to justify, two sources familiar with the matter said. Read More.

European Commission

Commission sends Statement of Objections to Teva on 'pay for delay' pharma agreement

The European Commission has informed pharmaceutical company Teva of its preliminary view that an agreement concluded with Cephalon was in breach of EU antitrust rules. Under the agreement, Teva committed not to market a cheaper generic version of Cephalon's drug for sleep disorders, modafinil. Read More.

Australia Competition and Consumer Commission

Criminal cartel investment pays off

For the first time in over 100 years in Australia, a cartelist was convicted, sentenced and fined for a breach of the criminal law yesterday. Despite NYK pleading guilty and cooperating with the prosecution, the $25 million fine is the second largest ever imposed under the Competition and Consumer Act (2010). Read More.

Truth on the Market

Democratic Party “Better Deal” Antitrust Proposals Would be a “Worse Deal” for the American Economy and Consumers

On July 24, as part of their newly-announced “Better Deal” campaign, congressional Democrats released an antitrust proposal (“Better Deal Antitrust Proposal” or BDAP) entitled “Cracking Down on Corporate Monopolies and the Abuse of Economic and Political Power.” Unfortunately, this antitrust tract is really an “Old Deal” screed that rehashes long-discredited ideas about “bigness is badness” and “corporate abuses,” untethered from serious economic analysis. Implementation of the BDAP’s recommendations would be a “worse deal” for American consumers and for American economic vitality and growth. Read More.



CRAI

The Commission’s e-commerce sector inquiry – Time to change presumptions on vertical restraints?

In this article, published in Competition Law and Policy Debate, Lars Wiethaus and Simon Chisholm review the findings relating to e-commerce in goods and, from an economic perspective, assess whether the reasons for firms to employ vertical restraints, as reported in the inquiry, are in line with possible pro-competitive or anti-competitive motivations. Read More.


Visit CompetitionFeed and read more.

Best wishes, CompetitionFeed Team
E-mail: valur@competitionfeed.com

About CompetitionFeed
By aggregating material from over 300 sources and using human and artificial intelligence to pick out the most important articles, CompetitionFeed provides an effective way to monitor all this information. That would be impossible for any single person.

Events and Jobs
Looking for a job or an interesting event to attend? Visit CompetitionFeed.com

newsletter